Detalles de la búsqueda
1.
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.
Neurosurg Focus;
54(1): E2, 2023 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36587409
2.
Developing nonlinear k-nearest neighbors classification algorithms to identify patients at high risk of increased length of hospital stay following spine surgery.
Neurosurg Focus;
54(6): E7, 2023 06.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37283368
3.
Which supervised machine learning algorithm can best predict achievement of minimum clinically important difference in neck pain after surgery in patients with cervical myelopathy? A QOD study.
Neurosurg Focus;
54(6): E5, 2023 06.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37283449
4.
Three-level ACDF versus 3-level laminectomy and fusion: are there differences in outcomes? An analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database cervical spondylotic myelopathy cohort.
Neurosurg Focus;
55(3): E2, 2023 Sep.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37657103
5.
Greater improvement in Neck Disability Index scores in women after surgery for cervical myelopathy: an analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Neurosurg Focus;
55(5): E7, 2023 11.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37913530
6.
Quality Outcomes Database Spine Care Project 2012-2020: milestones achieved in a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care and evolution to the American Spine Registry.
Neurosurg Focus;
48(5): E2, 2020 05 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32357320
7.
Correlation of return to work with patient satisfaction after surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: an analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Neurosurg Focus;
48(5): E5, 2020 05 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32357321
8.
Predictive model for long-term patient satisfaction after surgery for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Neurosurg Focus;
46(5): E12, 2019 05 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31042653
9.
A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Neurosurg Focus;
46(5): E13, 2019 05 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31042655
10.
Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Neurosurg Focus;
44(1): E3, 2018 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29290130
11.
Introduction. Biologics in spine surgery.
Neurosurg Focus;
50(6): E1, 2021 06.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34062503
12.
Is Upper Extremity or Lower Extremity Function More Important for Patient Satisfaction? An Analysis of 24-Month Outcomes from the QOD Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Cohort.
Clin Spine Surg;
37(4): 188-197, 2024 May 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706113
13.
What factors influence surgical decision-making in anterior versus posterior surgery for cervical myelopathy? A QOD analysis.
J Neurosurg Spine;
40(2): 206-215, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37948703
14.
Does diabetes affect outcome or reoperation rate after lumbar decompression or arthrodesis? A matched analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database data set.
J Neurosurg Spine;
40(3): 331-342, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38039534
15.
Impact of Educational Background on Preoperative Disease Severity and Postoperative Outcomes Among Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.
Clin Spine Surg;
37(3): E137-E146, 2024 04 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38102749
16.
Comparing posterior cervical foraminotomy with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in radiculopathic patients: an analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database.
J Neurosurg Spine;
: 1-13, 2024 Apr 19.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38626479
17.
What predicts the best 24-month outcomes following surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A QOD prospective registry study.
J Neurosurg Spine;
40(4): 453-464, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38181405
18.
Does the number of social factors affect long-term patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction in those with cervical myelopathy? A QOD study.
J Neurosurg Spine;
40(4): 428-438, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38241683
19.
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and driving abilities: defining the prevalence and long-term postoperative outcomes using the Quality Outcomes Database.
J Neurosurg Spine;
40(5): 630-641, 2024 May 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38364219
20.
Impact of Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation awards on subsequent grant funding and career outcomes of neurosurgeon-scientists.
J Neurosurg;
139(1): 255-265, 2023 Jul 01.
Artículo
en Inglés
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36585865